Marvin E. Kirsh
Kirsh2152000@yahoo.com
Abstract
In a philosophical model a special utility to motivations rather than general inquiry prompted by general need, normal maturation and aging or wish for self knowledge for advancement is attributed to the endeavors of civilization, especially those of a scientific and technological nature. Potential natural facts and circumstances suggested as unknown, undefined, confusing in retrospect, not referred to, are given an orientation with respect to known genetic and medical parameters and employed as explanation of facts in the tangible course of history, science theory construction and ensuing technology. A misreading of texts, nature, and history, narrow theory construction and interpretation of nature are theorized to include biological roots in genetic mechanisms, especially the mechanism of genetic inversion in gene sequences. A genetic mechanism, and innate human genetic constitution is suggested cause a blinding „inversion complex that dominates epistemology, ontology, and behavior. Contemporary scientific, social and philosophical topics, especially in the realm of free will, ethics and the interpretation of nature are discussed within a new framework outlined by these notions.
Discussion
It is arguable that modern day is a living out, an actively painted finger print of the past. For instance, historical conflicts surrounding World War II, its’ resolution with the A bomb, suggestive of heat, hot headedness, blind corners also refer to the construction and means of function of the bomb itself in which water and mass are confined together with a fuse able to create an exponentially propagating disturbance. In a parallel unobstructed situation of nature, the water evaporates before critical mass is reached. It is suggested that in historical situations that precipitate conflict there is a distinct parallel in the perception of conflicts, the way nature works, that the A-bomb as a destructive devise is patterned exactly from experience, historical experience and applied offensively. In a similar manner the recent threat with anthrax virus for military purposes can be described similarly as the employment of an offensive agent that is known and perceived from experience as something internally incorporated beneath the skin (a trespass), grown under the skin to virulency and applied unknowingly, with respect to potential meaning as a response to an intrusive offensive occupation. In the laboratory anthrax virus is cultivated by cloning the gene in a bacterial vehicle for it’s release and may parallel nature in the means of its’ actual offense to produce disease. Dozens of other examples of very indirect, devious means utilized in the name of science and technology , advanced understanding whether applied with poor intentions (military applications) or for healing, as physical contrivance to avoid nature are potentially describable.
Reliving, as a possible phenomenon, entails philosophical inquiry that is innately incomplete, lacking in important facts, the broad perspective here suggested In this respect unknowns/the undefined, the nebulous always avoid attention if they entail a threat. Pursuits of morality and behavior, especially those of ancient times from which we drawn modern frameworks are able to produce both nebulous concepts and modernly assumed more concrete forms that can be supported logically with mathematics if an unidentified injustice (i.e. pitiful subjugation to the elements) is perceived, or if perception intuitively entails an off centered environment For the purposes of maintaining simplicity a simple outline of this topic proceeds as follows: Important to interpretation of ancient writing details of the writing themselves are important. However so many of these potential topics related to this discussion are mostly commonly known they will not be reviewed here. A few historical facts however, considered most important for the present discussion are introduced. These are:
1) The writing of George Berkeley on mind and matter ; especially that which focuses on matter and that it cannot be logically conceived of without a perceiving witness to it at all times. This point is here reduced to a notion that the facts of cognition are ubiquitous and are the constituents and means of communications, defined as simple processes of witness (i.e. the reflection of light between two points is sufficient to define the points as witnesses). Location parameters within parallel points (places) are considered to be interchangeable with the constituents that compose communication means and thus can have no possible coherent content as a part of communications(i .e. cannot be transmitted in communication content) The writing of Nietzsche, in particular topics referred to in essays On the Genealogy of Morals, pertinent to topics related to appropriateness and inappropriateness, especially as they are related to the Jews, Arians and appropriately referred behavior. (the Jews perceiving the excessive violence of the Arians (in the company of strangers) in reference to their suffering, assume mannerisms appropriately properly belonging to other agents in their past history. Nietzsche also refers to a sense of having conquered, a lack of fear, of fear of man himself as having conquered himself and a failing at finding profundities that he considers the source of all advancement.
2) Important also are the writings of many figures (Freud, Mill, Locke, Hume, Descartes, Marx, Russell). I wish to note only of these their appropriateness to the topic of struggle, nature, and the search for happiness as a focus that is centered upon the individual, adjusted with statistics and averages, suggestions for the appropriateness of behavior to have a general utility that require generosity and giving for a better public welfare. These are considered important to contain concepts of utility in terms of moderation, concession, and self sacrifice. An awareness of limitation, limited means, and knowledge, and especially an orientation towards the natural elements of vulnerability threat, overwhelming threat modulated by blind need in which concepts of both threat and victim exclude a winning victim and losing threat, but a scientifically controlled/conquered threat that , though man acknowledges himself to be a part of nature does not include a self conquering in terms of lessening . These modern philosophies are theorized to have arrived at this offset manner via the “new” inclusion of statistics and utility which are not conceived of to have been also an innate but unspoken, perceived insufficiently in order to state or define. Statistical considerations, the ‘other’ arising from an inversion in self perspective are not only not new additions, linear extended concepts of what existed evolved in a direct natural unchanging route, but, elaborated as novel, result in a perceptually arisen deviated path. From this perspective recorded history and science pursuit can be seen to have generated illogically the dualism to explain the monism of which it is also immiscible. Theological, religious evolution at the same time, innately, intuitively conceiving the same philosophical concept of a unity, deviates along this same sociological monotheistic path to a single god, a modern god that at the same time has within it, has swallowed into itself concepts of power indicated in the described struggle that births both dualisms and a continued, continually renewed struggle to find a unity to nature as matter of natural course, acceptance of the unanswerable, but falsely identified paradox, in the search for natural truths that are commonly perceived as inherent to all. A second aggression, provoked, delivered in a provocating manner to opposing nature in order to control, reflecting his situation exactly in a mutually deleterious tug of war between the, now, mutually thoughtless; neither party with an awareness of the situation, nor with a disposition to remain footed in definition confined to physical description and location-one by means of ignorance, the other by means of an increasing unknown irritation , growing poor disposition, and an infinite appearing trail with insubstantial clues sufficient enough with which to build the accustomed analytical/logical concepts. These facts, in grander perspective represent a new open surface, potential interpretation to what is conceived as immovable. Aristotle as the first anatomist, physiologist, scientist, in artistic interpretation describes a prime mover, unmoved mover, that is secondary and not primary to cause and effect as modern day deities are described. It is within this line of inventiveness, contrivance, that an inversion, twist as if rolled along a self bounded single sided without self imposed resistance that surfaces as dissent, force, resistance, violence, etc. , thoughtlessness throughout modern society.
3) . The single impetus to structure a natural theory, to create a monism is thus illogically designated to perpetually house dualisms and dualisms as its construction elements. Consider the suggestion that the elements of cognition compose the properties of the biochemicals that compose the corporeal/material, rather than biochemicals and biological/physiological function the basic elements of cognition. In analogy might find a good correspondence to this statement with the idea that human happiness and suffering alone depend upon the happenstances of nature rather than self reflection alone to keep ones footing with respect to the earth. Correspondingly, if happenstance alone is the issue as a property of the world rather than of biochemicals in the case of cognition if cognition is considered to be a product of biochemicals, the purposes of discussion of morality/self reflection attain a utility analogously more in parallel to that of biochemicals as construction elements in a consistently applied world schemata in which primary stand alone principle can itself be attributed to factors having utility rather than as underlying fundamental principle and ubiquitously enabling an inverse entailment (i.e happenstance verses utility) in what ever objects/subjects arise as topics Or consider a response of “happenstance” to a fictitious mysterious falling from a wall of a king. If the king was pushed the words assume an inverted meaning of thoughtlessness and utility-i.e. exclusively either happenstance or utility. This analogy relates biochemicals to ethical reflection/introspection as a utility that is redifined as happenstance/basic principle, i.e. as the only principle and topic of written records and reflections. In further analogy enzymes are relate to structural integrity, metabolism and survival, which is both written in and from (biochemical genetic) record.
4) Such interaction, written by and written upon overlooked in interpretation as primary also to biological function is suggested to be not only analogous to similar sociological psychological behavior but the same empirically as a mechanism that underlines all of nature. A consistent and epistemologically infiltrated theme to all things construed of experience , history may subscribe/self subscribe to created/self-created record, creating/self creating a sense of no free will in retrospect if these concepts are is realized.(with an accompanying irritation) by the simple means of inaccurate diagnosis accompanied by compulsive behavior., that though potentially dependant on external factors, might also conceivably exist of itself (written on and by) less for the fact of such a rigorous, explorative and thoughtful philosophical approach, approach to nature that a single change in constructed schemata can provide a consistency to create shaded areas, fill shaded areas with potential facts/new variables that deductively render, still, an open remainder and possible furthered continuous interpretation , yet with the absence of potentially totally reorienting physical fact. If an analogy is made to legal malpractice there is no case to imply intention, negligence or error entailing a violatable parity to nature, a thoughtless action that somehow violates it as well as an ensuing ubiquitous civilization blindness to its’ existence that is evolved from abstraction dedicated to assemble available fact via an irritating agent in the environment,., and literally engulfed with a higher ascribed principle in generalized theory construction. Potentially represented as a fork in the trail-its’ description falsely categorized as a basic construction element, and a lack of boldness to choose a direction –thoughtfulness reinvented as objectivity but resulting as incoherent in meaning. Prominent in this analogy is an inverted order in concepts; a general facet of chemicals/biochemicals/physiological action is best construed as a cause of cognition and happenstance; a failure of reflectively arrived at morality is not a cause of suffering (though in each case actions' biochemical actions have utility with respect to circumstances suggesting that, as instigation to a process of human conceptual inversion, not only physical facts of circumstances are missing , but facts of circumstances related to a situation of circumstantial (rather than happenstantial) physical inversions that are suited for scientific inquiry ; if not implicating “inversion” as both a source of a ubiquitous natural (and natural ethic lending) parity but as both the primary conceptual and physical construction element of the universe.
5) It is also evident, despite the fact that genes and biochemicals are recently discovered, that it is thought possible to understand cognition from chemistry, physics and biochemistry, a poor act of god upon mankind as a whole has never been discovered, added to the repertoires of interpretation, the horse is chronically placed before the cart, inverted, and little is perceived wrong that way -life activities of the human population, represented by production and consumption are not affected, inverted, or show signs of disturbance parallel to these facts in a similar manner as the false ordering of concepts, read in reverse, are tied by habit to the far past by meaning. It is postulated that daily life sustenance activity/physiological need is oblivious to disturbances in the genetic record, to genetic like disturbances that they are inversion resistant. It is suggested .that it has evolved as it exists by definition that there is no empirical meaning to the direction of reading or writing of the genetic information related to this activity (i.e the acquisition of physical sustenance) . Maybe it is contained in palindromes, mirror images that read the same in either direction verses a myriad of not so good in fortune lending possibilities to account for a long list of genetic defects and diseases arriving simply from a poor happenstance of nature. The gene for b-lactosidase an enzyme of breast milk that enables its’ digestion is a palindromic sequence.
6) It is apparently possible to describe an inversion complex that involves vision, thought and behavior in a framework of missing facts and resulting misconstrued natural principle. If one thinks of temperature inversion and current environmental concerns it is hypothesized that industry with contributions of the average citizen, produces by-products from technology that is evolved from the same inversion in concepts and contriving invention causing a heat inversion that threatens the ecology of the earth, the medical health of the population. If one persists with the application of the notion of inversion, if it is the genes that according to modern epistemology precede the enzymes and structural biochemicals of the cell, one might, adhering to the same false correspondences and ordering, construe that a tangible act of god is omitted in the thoughtful discussions of the world for reason that the genes do not discriminate themselves or biochemicals they produce from the universe. This might imply that the existence of a genetic language in terms of self replication of the DNA and transcription to RNA and translation to protein, as a ubiquitous process to living things has no coherent conceptual meaning without lending a potential to genes for the construction of thinking entities. i.e. genetic elements are structural only and the existence of a genetic language is an illusion descended from a real matter of physical properties of the genetic material. These contradictions of interpretation, inversions of definition and priorities entail notions of free will - advanced control of behavior even within reflections about chromosomes and genetics. Solution for genetic clues into human behavior would then be futile as normals for behavior have evolved to construe laborious intellectual reflection, moral reflection related to nature as a cure for poor natural happenstance’s, the genes as the producers of thought - a completely self subscribing self continued and contained conceptual system in which epistemology and ontology naturally finds example in the environment from the nature of writing/rewriting and the drawn parallel of theory construction to utility with respect to the environment. A correctly arrived at conceptual perspective must be a prerequisite before such a (potentially perceived in appearance) hoaxless hoax bears necessary profundities. An explanation for a lack of discovery of this confusion, a distorted perspective, is attributed to an era-species encompassing common “inversion complex” in which naturally existing genetic mechanisms , evolved genetic constitutions, social/psychological, historical behavior, mechanisms of change parallel one another. That this is evidently manifest is suggested from the drawn parallel of arrived concepts in the life and physical sciences to interpreted notions from the ancient literature. Contrasts in discussions regarding morality, pleasure, happiness, ultimate goals from different civilizations, though of basically the same era’s (the ancient Greeks: Plato-Socrates, Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, the Skeptics) oscillate in disagreement between the projected gains of intellectual reflection, decision/action, fate, what is practically knowable, a path of least resistance and adjustment. In interpretations, an unchangeable place of the situation of man with respect to the situation of the universe on one hand appears to coexist in time with new emphasis on the man as an individual seizing control of his own fate by knowing his moral choices. A philosophically modeling of all these notions together meant to reside under a single roof might have a parallel associated with environmental influences , actual location, the experience of life on earth. A sieving of notions to filter a common meaning , suggests an oscillating disagreement, unknown relation of man to unknown facts of the universe. The stoics interpreted the world as repetitive cycles of (unexplained or identified) explosion and rebirth, a resetting/renewing -exacting the same form cycle to cycle- A phenomenon that IF laid to reason bears plausible explanation with concept of an an existing physical inversion, an (temporal-physical) obstruction and a perpetual seeking to resolution in analogy to a spring on a clock that is perpetually rewound. A blindness is suggested within notions (the stoics) of a an inviolable harmony in relations attributed to world components regardless of the magnitude of ratios of size constituents of the universe to its whole. Action within a lesser defined niche occupied by man and affording some freedom of respective latitudes (though interpreted as incapable of violating a universal harmony that dictates all) are described as potentially especially ill fated, again suggesting a universal obstruction that restricts actions of free will. This is interesting as one might normally construe (random) nature as having a total latitude of free will, suggesting an inappropriate fate served to nature. A whimsical nature of the will of the gods in dictates to man, Plato’s relations intended to free mens’ choices from that of wishes of the gods, describe a free will of choice of men as free individual agents to rule their own fate, a line of fatalism that persists to modern day is philosophically unresolved and apparently motivates contemporary scientific endeavors that embrace incoherent abstractions as a source of physical power over nature. It appears that modern man refers to the world as if it intentionally conceals, subjects it to interrogation that at the same time, perceived to be necessary, necessarily presents findings and a challenge to the concept of free will.
7) If one considers the theory of relativity, its two aspects, a general theory of relativity and a special theory of relativity, and regards its’ intention and concept as a monism, but houses under one roof dualisms of equal and opposites, is a monistic dualism constructed of dualisms as elementary parts constructed of untestable mass values from invisible entities of constructed abstractions, relative time, space dilations/contractions as mathematically coherent ratios to explain a relationship to an ‘over there’ that intuitively raises an issue of mathematically comparison but its’ abstracted nature requires an inordinate high IQ to reconcile its’ tenets with common sense and in this sense is again not only self subscribing but immune to direct confirmation, as ordinary common sense, less it relinquish it’s immunity to itself , its’ self, cannot accommodate it, yet has no means to refute its’ empirical power to conquer unknowns that are birthed from equally misunderstood abstraction. In light of a potentially existing “inversion blindness” the theory of relativity is suggested to be similarly founded from the same sense of ‘invisible’ utility that leads to the theoretical construction model of thought invoking but thoughtless biochemicals that when construed in parallel to an unknown poor natural happenstance cannot but dictate tenets that violate free will, free will of atoms, and refers invisibly to (as is suggested to be the case of all contemporary doctrine and scientific theory that is associated with prediction that parallels the empirical) an unknown, undefined state that modulates the fate of civilization. If one might abstract less dangerously, that a correct set of elements, illustrated here to be maybe under rocks, are attributed to the problems of mankind, mankind has looked correctly under some rocks and incorrectly under others, without a unifying concept in hand to guide his endeavor.
8) Current research highlights:
Conceptual values of an empirical nature, apparently spontaneously assignable by the brains primitive
machinery from visual input have been found experimentally(14) making it scientifically plausible that a perceivable environmental variable might had been construed unknowingly in ancient times into concepts as general fact. For example, a red heated sky in the evening at times of success and high fertility, though maybe derived from a destructive space collision could result in perceptual assimilations that skirt higher reasoning abilities and lead to notions that forceful destructive collisions emanating red heat make the world work. Temporal inversions, of tested acquired fact verses circumstantial synthesis from data for concept construction appear to have plausible scientific explanation and bear as necessity a correct perceptually ordered perspective as necessity for conceptual insight. With respect to a simple ordering of categories into appropriateness/inappropriateness it may seem valid to reverse B with A, A with B, to extrapolate the nature of unknown events, assume that witness is fooled by a consistent temporal coincidence, i .e. light from galaxy A is mistaken as light from Galaxy B based on where it falls. This is not uniformly possible to accomplish, but with a difficulty arrived at newly reoriented scheme for the construction of nature.... it was night time and not day light at times when I am not sure to know which is which at the same time when the Baskerville hounds are tricked which is which when they got the scent...on the trail to an injustice. ‘I know by familiarity, in this case, the Baskerville hounds, though neither of us bears exact knowledge of the truth, even if I am suspicious of the truth I might not suspect to mistrust a commonly shared simple perception.’ It is at this event that science commonly stamps the seal of law less for a loss of meaning, ‘if neither I nor the hounds know the truth from first hand witness, think otherwise what bearing can it have?’; the tools and machinery of society doing what ever it is, scientifically/technically, are then engaged in a confident harmony serving. This juncture though has not been reached, research and theory remain substantially unquestioned this way and the machinery’s of advancement proceed without doubt that it is unlikely that both my tools and the level balance of the earth where I apply them are both inverted. In this manner false self subscribing theory attains positive test and functions upon application in a manner to redefine. In analogy genetic algorithms currently applied to create population models are susceptible to premature convergence-i.e. failed projection from closure of the designated factor surveyed. Similar algorithms used to study physical phenomenon, propagations, suffer a loss of uniqueness-survey character loss. Employing similar algorithms in models to predict clustering of characteristics/segregation of traits in test paralleling the opinion of experts can be achieved from mathematics. The failed genetic transmission of characteristics through a population thus has some sort of threshold that mathematically, in these examples, is more likened to a sensitivity level-experimental ability, though the potential loss of uniqueness, variable closure that are not construed pertinent as they do not bear on existing observation, at the same time do not reflect origins at all, and imply them only as unspoken….a dualism, the cart chasing the horse, a genetic algorithm genetically chasing after a model of successful evolution that resembles the divide of relativity into a special case and general case, the open and the closed .. yet a single open genetic surface . Mathematics, though created from perceptual insight, might not emphasize enough the, more than construed, relative nature of perceptual interpretation, and yet reveals a situation in which modeled genetic transmission insufficiently- falters by means of inadequate experimental design- the same elements, can be made to exactly coincide with educated opinion by the same means. Assumptions in modeling, the assumption of a desired forwards direction (of evolution) in a positive/suitable model cannot only be false but in the same instant expose, in a state of blindness to it, a flexible nature of choice that can be guided only by rigorous moral reflection and thoughtfulness, either to violate or not a naturally existing inviolatable parity.. A scientific as well as philosophical understanding is further from complete than assumed.
Conclusion
Struggles to order the world, the reliance on concept as a tool for continuance convincing and potentially sound creating (excuse the pun) philosophical argument, proof, scientific proof , to verify and understand within a framework of phenomenon established from perceptual evidence as a grounding criteria, result instead in (unnecessary) philosophical and scientific establishment/creation from abstraction. The self subscribed and birthed, derived from either the former or latter (creation- abstraction), are cyclically progenerated and needlessly overcomplicated to resemble the perception of life , experience, the life process and are entangled with the pursuit; of completeness within this same perspective. As sublimation and pretense for a necessary and required understanding of nature; physical explanation emanating from this same conceptual/perceptual source, based on the perception of light and sound to produce light and sound; results. Total comprehension resides in a dark blinded area, in the form of a mirror of the proximal, of known nature that is composed of the construction of contrivances from science, nature as a contrivance in its' structural delineation; that depend on, for their creation (epistemologically unresolved) conceptual inversions and dualisms, and for their function, on a potential energy derived from physical inversion, and entertains a heading of human suffering . Objectiveness in perspectives requiring perceptual distance, in the same instance exclude an elemental descriptive unit as a fact also elemental to cognition, perception/perceptual ability such that a perceptual blindness ('inversion blindness') and illness ('inversion complex') result from a struggle in which fact is sought from either a ( physical (medical/scientific) genetic or humanly written) record or it’s recording agent (brain/molecular genetic mechanisms) in a setting of physical and psychological accommodation to a painful helplessness, unpermitted awareness to a potential ‘thoughtless’ act of nature. Thoughtful assertion , aggression, oriented by habit, evolved from an undefined and thoughtless natural act, also evolves; to embody ;a “thoughtlessness. An evolved central, eventually paralyzing ‘inversion’ (thoughtfulness with thoughtlessness) of position in this struggle, that can be experienced as a predetermination of choices, a fatalism; that emerges with non specific roots with in philosophical questioning, matters of free will, exists and consists of an emotionally based misconception and seems to be endeavored towards a chronic and incurable state as a result of a failure to find, passively recognize and objectively acknowledge a sameness of the self with perceived nature in lieu of avoiding and tangential pursuits that become laden with description that mirror/parallel problems and are trended chaotically on an inevitably long; but self-indulging, ambush of unsuspected fact . Modern epistemology is thus in the same instant both grossly and pettily invalid, confused at the border demarcating the abstract and the empirical.
References
1) Adams, R.M ed Berkeley, George Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous, 1979 Hackett Publishing Co. Inc.
2) Ballester, Pedro J., Carter, Jonathan N. (2006) Characterising the parameter space of a highly nonlinear inverse problem Inverse Problems in Science & Engineering; Mar2006, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p171-191
3) Berkeley, George A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Hackett Publishing Co. Inc. 1982
4) Chen, YingPing, Goldberg , David ,E., (2005) Convergence Time for the Linkage Learning Genetic Algorithm, Evolutionary Computation; Fall2005, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p279-302
5) Coleman, P. Nature 446, Frontier at Your Fingertips: Between the nano- and micrometre scales, the collective behaviour of matter can give rise to startling emergent properties that hint at the nexus between biology and physics, 379 (22 March 2007) | doi:10.1038/446379a; Published online 21 March 2007
6) Einstein, T.L. Survey of Self Avoiding Random Surfaces on Cubic Lattices: Issues, Controversies, and Results IMA Volumes IN Mathematics and its Applications Springer-Verlag KG 1992
7) Einstein, Albert Physics and Reality Journal of the Franklin Institute 22 1:3 359-382 March 1986 Tilton, H.B., Smarandache, F. ed. Today'sTake On Einsteins' Relativity Proceedings Of The Conference At Pima Community College East Campus Feb 18 2005 Pima College Press
8) Fogelin, Robert, 2001, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Berkeley and The Principles of Human Knowledge (Routl edge, 2001)
9) Golden feld, N., 1 and Woese, C., Biology's Next Revolution: The emerging picture of microbes as gene-swapping collectives demands a revision of such concepts as organism, species and evolution itself., Nature 445, 369 (25 January 2007) | doi: 10. 1038/445369a; Published online 24 January 2007
10) Kirsh, Marvin, E. Form Generates Form: Time as a Second Order Rate Constant From Indecision Between Heisenberg Uncertainty and Einstein Legality 2007 (in review Ludus Vitalis)
11) Kirsh, Marvin, E. Uniqueness and Self Belonging in Nature 2007 (in review Ludus Vitalis
12) Kirsh, Marvin, E. Force Space/Extension: Ethics and Existence 2007(in review Ludus Vitalis)
13) Knight, D. Kinds of Minds: Do differences in history, culture and education influence whether scientists focus on pieces and particulars, or make broad connections?, Nature 447, 149 (10 May 2007) | doi: 10. 1038/447149a; Published online 9 May 2007
14) Lam, Vincent (2007) The singular nature of space-time. In [2006] Philosophy of Science Assoc. 20th
15) Li, Maojun, Fan, Shaosheng, and Luo, An,( 2004), A Partheno-genetic Algorithm for Combinational Optimization, Neural Information Processing:11th International Conference , ICONIP 2004,Calcutta India
16) Macknik SL, Martinez-Conde S, Consciousness: Neurophysiology of visual awareness, New Encyclopaedia of Neuroscience, Ed. Larry R. Squire, Elsevier, Oxford; (In Press).
17) Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL (2007), Mind Tricks- Cognitive Scientists take a lesson from MagiciansNature; 448, 414
18) Martinez-Conde S (2007) Mind Matters, . Blindsight: When the brain sees what you do not the Scientific American blog on science and mind
19) Michaelson, A., Morley, E., (1886), Influence of the Motion of the Medium on the Velocity of Light Am. J. of Science 3 1:377-386Michaelson, A., Morley, E., (1887), On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether Am. J. of Science, 34:333-336
20) Peccianti,M ,Dyadyusha A, Kaczmarek M., Assanto, G. Turnable Refraction and Reflection of Self Confined Light Beams Nature Physics 2:737-742 November 2006 (Letters)
21) Pelikan, Martin, Goldberg, David, E., Tsutsui, Shigeyosh (2003) Getting the best of both worlds: Discrete and continuous genetic and evolutionary algorithms in concert Information Sciences; Nov2003, Vol. 156 Issue 3/4, p147
22) Putnam, Hillary Collapse of the Fact Value Dichotomy and Other Essays 2002 Harvard University Press
23) Quine, w. v. o., Indeterminacy of Translation Again, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 84, No. 1, Jan. 1987
24) Quine, w. v. o. , From a Logical Point of View Harvard University Press, 1953
25) Russell, Bertrand, My Philosophical Development, 1959, Simon and Schuster NYC.
26) Russell, Bertrand, Whitehead, Alfred North, Principia Mathematica , second edition Cambridge University Press 1962
27) Russell, Bertrand , The Problems of Philosophy, 1997, Oxford university Press
28) Shuler, Marshall, G., Bear, Mark,F.,(2006) Reward Timing in the Primary Cortex Science Vol 311no 5767 pp:1606-1609
29) Slipher The radial velocity of the Andromeda Nebula 1912 Observatory Bulletin, pp.2.56- 2
30) de Sitter, W., On Distance, Magnitude, and Related Quantities in an Expanding Universe (1934) Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands, Vol. 7, p.205
31) Tipton, Ian C. Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism , 1974 London: Methuen
32) Velmans, Max (2007) Reflexive Monism.(in press)
33) Yu, Tian-Li, Yassine ,Ali ,A., Goldberg, David,E. (2007) An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms Research in Engineering DesignVol18 Number 2 p91