A1=(unique things)                                   true                     A set of unique things is unique

                                                                                  (i.e. the set of natural numbers is unique as each

                                                                               number is unique)

A2=(emerging things)                              false                    If C1 is emerging (i.e. true) its’ only possible                             

                                                                                           (intuitive) direction to include its’ original

                                                                                     unique identity is to false (emergence of an       

                                                                                     emerging  characteristic implies the assumption

                                                                                     of a new identity  (i.e. 2 X N (N=the set of natural

                                                                                                    numbers) =N2 ( i.e.  0, 2, 4 ,6 ,8 etc.) might be defined

                                                                                           to have  emerged from  N but  is  also a member of

                                                                               N, N itself cannot emerge.

A3=self avoiding things                           false                To fit a definition of self avoiding a set

                                                                                                           must have more than one member, each

                                                                                                           avoiding  the other  by virtue of a force upon each

                                                                                                           other.  In this definition the existence

                                                                               of two unique members entails self

                                                                               avoidance, separateness, uniqueness

                                                                               of the elements of the set,  a single

                                                                                                   unique set cannot avoid itself.     

Each of the descriptive  elements as members of set A (Natures’  Set) but uniqueness does not belong to themselves.(i.e. contains falses in the test for self belonging) . A set of items each unique is assumed to belong to the set of unique items.   Natures’ Set, description of the the set of unique particulars, is used to describe the set of unique volumes that comprise nature.   It is this set of unique volumes that become test elements, i.e. for self belonging, emergence, self avoidance etc. At this point of description, at the juncture between the concept and the physical (given existence as volume ) certain associations of meaning that connect  the conceptual and physical surface distinctly in elaborations might emerge at an entailment of conceptual developments that resolve into the self belonging  and parallel sets of the physical volume and the conceptual description as inference based on the existence of unique physical entities  (e.g. the egg, DNA) that are simultaneous members of both classes.  Here, as it has been established that conceptual description of nature belong to itself and that physical description of nature, as a unique heterogeneous volume containing unique heterogeneous volumes, in the same sense  belongs to itself. It is obvious that “string of information” is both physical and conceptual and does not withstand the test for self belonging, it is both physical and conceptual and does not  belong to itself, as a concept it is physical, as a physical element it is conceptual.  A  concept of volume is entailed to also exist in physical example (as a volume in the set of volumes, and as a concept in the set of concepts) and in nature has no classification potential but as unique, as a volume of nature is unique itself)  The physically existing conceptual form is proposed to be entailed from the special cases of the egg or DNA discussed in which a linear arrangement of temporal loci of connections emerge as a physical shape, otherwise to result in logical contradiction of the conjectured unique nature of heterogeneous spaces occupying nature; the physical form entailed to heterogeneous spaces would either have to distribute validly to all elements in the test for uniqueness or, if placed in some other descriptive category to cause a chaos in descriptive ordering so that the conceptual and physical are not separable throughout. . Conceptual description in this model is limited to description of the physical only.

  The world as information  becomes no more valid in test than the fact of uniqueness which, ubiquitously valid, entails physical parameters to all of the contents of nature, is self belonging as a concept. Alternately the qualities of emergence, self avoidance/force, are not self belonging, entail and are entailed by uniqueness.  A faithful understanding of nature cannot contain entail a distinct category for information/information string, but only a special category for a unique special form that is distributable,  as a conceptual shape lacking the number system when it represents uniqueness and  possessing information as the parameters of path that render physical surface when applied to the empirical object.

  The number system can also be excluded from  Natures’ descriptive Set;  self-avoidance entails the number 2 but not the number 1, thus the number system cannot be applied as a member of Natures’ Set.  An open nature as a closed concept in description must entails the entire number system rather than a subset of it, or not entail it at all. In this description of nature, the ability  to observe and/or measure, i.e. determine volume and/or number,  entails emergence of both number and volume to all witnessible (heterogeneous) physical entities if the number system is entailed  and conversely to the descriptive categories employed. The observed counting in nature by members of the species is thus a product of their uniqueness, endowment with emerging volume and physical characteristics; nature itself does not bear in gross description the property of number-number is a manifestation from the first person perspective. Similarly, the term infinity is conjectured to be  descriptive/lingual and to have no relevance scientifically.  Men, in contrast to animals, have the capacity to establish longer chains of proximity related cause and effect, when extended beyond observation become inductive and refer symbolically to the inducer (16).  Natures’ Set, entailing one instance of nature, does not contain other numbers than 2 (and itself, an unwitnessible number 1) (see note 1), though the set of the parameters of volume contains the entire number system;  a set of entities emerging in both number and volume. i.e. it is not unreasonable to postulate that all natural entities, each  unique  and possessing energy ,  necessarily constantly emerge with time, are never in the same exact state of number or volume from one time point to another.

It is logical to define the universe not only with respect to a closed set of open volumes, but with respect to a determined shape or form to represent these volumes that delineate it as special case rather than as a information possessing construct of  parametrically described  fields.   It  is logical that a parallel to  open-closed, or concept-physical, the genetically-arrived-by-proximity heterogeneous object, exists as a form in concept and as a primary object in nature. 

Form in Nature

   The conjectured possession of a universal form conceptually and physically to nature should logically entail facts of perception of the external from the first person. A universal form should encompass perceivable nature as a fact of parametrically endowed path, as a universal that is present proximally as well as distally.  It must reflect what is established of motion as kinetic energy of masses that are endowed, as a function of mass, with potential energy. The equations of relativity and laws of motions might be suited to describe a universal geometry in which the propagation of energy and mass combine to delineate a specific form. This, however, might not be considered feasible in light of the existence of both a general and special theory of relativity and the existence of a universal constant that is hardly compatible with a universe that possesses the number system only in reference to the empirically testable physical element.  In order to render the velocity of light a physical reality it must be considered relative rather than constant, to possess an open value.

      Figure 2b shows an oval used as a scheme to project form emerging from the linear motion of a (variable velocity of light) emitting  mass.  Variable values of ∆c are employed to represent energy expended during the process of light emission from a moving point source.  Figure 2a demonstrates an egg figure that results when periods of revolution beyond π+ 10^13 are employed.  (see equations with Figure 2a). This is interpreted to represent a vast number of ½ full sign changes in the sine and cosine functions employed, as half turns analogous to a half twist, for example,  that composes the continuous, inside to out surface of the mobius strip.   Space is postulated  to generally be the evolution of a volume containing surface from energy emitted in a bi-planar fashion from motion along a  line: e.g. the production of an appearing closed surface from a fast radiation  represented mathematically as an emerged plane from the  emerged slow speed motion along a line. Biological form is proposed to occur from internal  DNA arrangement, and from facets of the composite heterogeneous structure of  individuals of a particular species.  Conceptual application of the postulated specific (egg) shaped space of volume, entailing  a differential  timing with respect to spaces that is inherent in the propagation of the heterogeneous nature of structures, emergence of the individual is framed conceptually to occur  within a perspective involving  multiple foci, as multiple distinct and subjective points from which emergences fill space, each space and surrounding spaces,  egg shapes  in which intercourses, relative temporal periods  define the form of occurring processes.   The view under the microscope is postulated to be composed of a near infinity of  temporally- spatially, in concert,  mutually modulated occurrences that are accountable for explanation from a position of points centered within the volumes involved, the radius of volumes described, as in the graph of the egg. Structure, is suggested to be a matter of inherited proximities and relative temporal aspects  of emerged volumes, i.e. relative (inherited by means of temporal/spatial proximity) sizes   of intercoursing volumes. Each heterogeneous division  possesses a strict and contiguous lineage that delineates its’ identity, as a provision for explanation of emerged form,  orders and associations.  The metabolic processes of DNA replication, transcription, and translation, many orders faster than species or individual reproduction occur in orchestration  within a whole as it similarly possesses prior orchestration by the same means.  Each genetic unit, i.e. the gene arranged as a contiguous string of codons that are elucidated as contiguous strings of bases, can be viewed as nested, independent, specifically metabolically active spatial egg shaped volumes whose existence is the result of a temporal entanglement that is manifest physically as nested temporal entanglements, conceptual like as time might also be construed as a conceptual entity whose empirical measurement is the consequence of a dynamically occurring synergism of perspective dependant, entity specific,  intersections of internal and external, proximal and distal, energy processes. 

     In attempts to draw a parallel between the physical egg and DNA it is not inconceivable to propose a parallel of the rendering of the egg from a string of planar geometrical  coordinates  to the string of chemical base elements within  a complete unit such as a chromosome. DNA replication to produce progeny chromosomes might feasibly be the manifestation of processes that are distinct temporally from temporal processes entailed to a linear internal diversity that is also  reiterated on a smaller scale within the whole DNA length in  lesser units such as genes. All internal processes, e.g. transcription, translation etc appearing to act in regulated sequences are defined to be temporal/spatial, functions of relative endurances of process time in relation to process volume in a manner analogous to a  conceptual structuring of the world into hierarchies related to priorities of importance with respect to pertinence as it relates to the navigation/survival of the world, and necessarily emerging to draw parallel in structure to the energetic rendering of the physical world as it is experienced (see note 1). In the model three dimensional active structure results as a process of intercoursing (egg) shapes  that obey the  laws of energy metabolism, but occurring in description from a first perspective of interacting entities, of interacting entities within interacting entities: an analogy might be made to a whole unwitnessible volume as the universe that contains  witnessible physical volumes; both as proximity dependant emergences, temporal transmissions of physical form, though DNA, proposed to be the  consequence of a near energy exhaustion from  long temporal transmission embodies to it in physical form   diversities  attributable to the nature of the courses of energy from which it evolved.  It is interesting, in this model, that the birth of life is attributable to a near universal end, short circuit, rather than as an addition occurring to a universe composed of inert matter; a circumstance in which  birth has no logically extractable empirical meaning, physical reality, experience towards death is both the necessity and final cause of life,  birth and death, the existence of birth as cause and necessity for the existence of death, commonly knowable to life experience are inverted temporally  such that the final cause, near extinction determines physical structure which seems to evolve in a temporally positive manner during biological development.; embryogenesis appears to occur as a reiteration from an averted (by whatever means if the described death is possible) death. 

     DNA appears in this example to possess both very long and very short temporal periods relative to the individual species member. For instance the energetic/metabolic activity time of a given gene in its’ environment within the cell in relation to cell life time may be short, shorter in relation to individual longevity and very short in relation to the endurance times of species specific DNA.  This is an innate fact of proximal inheritance.  If number and volume in a heterogeneous space emerge together it might be possible, from a correlation of the active period of specific  DNA species or sequences, of the cell or whole organism, and an accounting relating number and volume, to gain  facts of internal to external complexity  that might reveal facts about the nature of the relation of external  (phenotype) to internal  (genotype) characteristics.  It might be estimated  that the number and volume of validly construed functional aspects  might relate analytically to temporal ratios construed for specific developmental and or subsequent matured processes of the individual organism if analyzed  with respect to  transverse verse longitudinal temporal  prominence-i.e. from near round as might exemplify the individual, to the excessively eccentric, the length and width of the DNA molecule at the extreme; an invariable construction  maintenance factor might be conjectured to describe natural physical limitations to diversities in combinations of observed traits.      The emergence of volume and number together of the heterogeneous unit , as the cohesive defining factor of emergences, uniquenesses, might account for  a significant latitude in ultimate form, structure and function as they are mutually related genetically and physically within defined volumes and  for the plasticity and diversities observed in interspecies developmental and adult structural  organizations.   The purpose of this abstracted discussion as effective volumes of processes and number of traits at the molecular level of DNA are not available, nor for individuals,  is to demonstrate a potential functional and structural  unification to processes within what is denoted as the nucleus, the cell, the individual organism, the species and external spaces.

      Consider the egg shape and egg in the  subspecies of snakes  Sand Boas (Eryx: Boidae) (17). The Sand Boa is dividable into either those that produce live births and those that are egg laying. This is a conflicting result as the physiological requirements for the two paths of reproduction are very different, yet are present in the same species. The biochemistries of these two processes are sufficiently different,  In order to account for the differences within a single species a very strained and awkward line of species evolution is necessary for explanation. Here It becomes obvious that neither type of birth, nor the specific aspects of DNA evolution into information sequences are the essential characteristics of speciation. DNA sequence in the rendering of information for the construction of proteins cannot be viewed as an intrinsic characteristic in classifications involving temporally oriented emergence;  inherited  physical proximities are the ultimate modulator of variation. In concept the means of birth, egg laying or live birth, might be minor consequences in an order of temporal  inheritances that ultimately determine structure and function.  It might be indicated that a means of birth, reproduction, , is a built-in and plastic  facet that  is assumed with the ability, arrived from a multitude of converging criteria common to all life ,  to propagate; the  type of reproduction , live birth or egg laying  is at most secondary  and not an essential characteristic, in this case, that is a component of  species identity. It is proposed that classification of the species need not adhere  to evidence pertaining to internal metabolism and biochemical genetic features. Factors that influence emergence, acting in concert to achieve viability may necessarily be unpredictable if hidden, invisible beneath the surface, and distinct from more apparent explanation of the acquisition of  structure and function; the presence of an underlining form may be a necessary and responsible agent, separately responsible , on its’ own,  for the nature of natural processes.

Conclusion

   Current methods in biological classification, attempting rigor with respect to analytical detail derived from intra-cellular investigation are compulsively over-extended. Philosophical grounding results  to be  inherently precluded in models that embody questions pertaining to composing temporal elements, allude towards conceptions and death,  rather than elements  composed strictly of symbols that reflect a physical organization to the paths of events that fill space.  In reference  to the ideas presented connecting mind and matter to a shape, failed philosophical grounding is now re-referred  to accounts for the existence of life with a failed energetic/work function to reach a complete/zero state-i.e. to notions involving a physical ground as in an electrical circuit; lifetime is gauged from an  induced notion of death rather than an induced and empirically unaccountable notion of birth. This inversion in perspective has general philosophical relevance, a whole life time for nature/processes  cannot be discussed meaningfully but as conceptual and inductive  and with respect to progress towards an unwitnessible, as the whole of nature is unwitnessible,  death in which connotations of birth have even less, no meaning, they refer, no matter how they may be recounted, to the granted, singular  and apriori fact of existence itself.  The individual has no perceptual account of his birth, only of his aging and progression towards a non-existent state of death. That the universe proceeded from this failed state might be witnessed to be conceptually possessed within a  description of the nature of all that is knowable from life experience. This  may have little relevance to activities entailed to the empirical sciences in which witness perspective is possible for both birth and death of entities but entails a new conceptual perspective in which the concept of time is relocated away from the high priority conceptual category that does not contain the set of numbers to an empirical category that is restricted to witnessable and necessarily measurable phenomenon; from the conceptually closed category of concepts to the open category of physical volumes.   Temporally transverse notions from the social sciences become eliminated from major concepts in the natural sciences, concepts in the natural sciences become more reasonable and coherent, appealing   to the social sciences.      

      With the use of methods that employ generally descriptive criteria for nature it is possible to attain an understanding from which  a more practical synthesis of the physical from the conceptual can emerge.  As in language communication, in which meaning can become assumed without specified knowledge or reference to roots, eventually lost, in a parallel to lingual phenomenon, it is perhaps not necessary to elucidate, induce, invent meaning, or orient research efforts towards the impossible elaboration of events that are strictly and logically beyond witness (16), but to identify with best common sense and faithfulness  a commonality of  structure  buried within contemporary intercourses.